🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.